User:InProgress/Common Questions Drafts/Page 4 - Revision history

DanaRepouille at 00:31, 11 October 2010

2010-10-11T00:31:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, 11 October 2010
Line 61:		Line 61:
	(2) The vast majority of all changes made to the Book of Mormon are changes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Only a small handful of changes have been made to the text that actually change the meaning of the text in any way. Many of these changes were made by Joseph Smith himself.		(2) The vast majority of all changes made to the Book of Mormon are changes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Only a small handful of changes have been made to the text that actually change the meaning of the text in any way. Many of these changes were made by Joseph Smith himself.

	(3) Anyone is welcome to read earlier editions of the Book of Mormon and compare it with modern editions. [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] delete this statement and rephrase it in a ~~postive~~ statement: The LDS Church is not trying to be deceitful or secretive about these changes.[[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]]The Church is currently involved in a long project to make available all the documents regarding the various editions of the Book of Mormon.[[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] Comment not for the text: something should be noted about ~~Skousens~~ work. [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]]		(3) Anyone is welcome to read earlier editions of the Book of Mormon and compare it with modern editions. [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] delete this statement and rephrase it in a positive statement: The LDS Church is not trying to be deceitful or secretive about these changes.[[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]]The Church is currently involved in a long project to make available all the documents regarding the various editions of the Book of Mormon.[[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] Comment not for the text: something should be noted about Skousen's work. [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]]

	(4) Joseph Smith said that the Book of Mormon was the "most correct book" in the sense that "a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts than by any other book." In other words, the Book of Mormon is not the most correct book in terms of spelling, punctuation, and grammar, but in terms of its ability to bring a man closer to Christ.		(4) Joseph Smith said that the Book of Mormon was the "most correct book" in the sense that "a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts than by any other book." In other words, the Book of Mormon is not the most correct book in terms of spelling, punctuation, and grammar, but in terms of its ability to bring a man closer to Christ.

	(5) Modern translations of the Bible differ in thousands of ways from earlier translations of the Bible (ex. KJV vs NIV). The changes are an attempt to improve translation and help the reader better understand God's intended message. That is precisely the motivation behind changes in the Book of Mormon.		(5) Modern translations of the Bible differ in thousands of ways from earlier translations of the Bible (ex. KJV vs. NIV). The changes are an attempt to improve translation and help the reader better understand God's intended message. That is precisely the motivation behind changes in the Book of Mormon.

	===Additional resources===		===Additional resources===
Line 137:		Line 137:

	===Longer answer===		===Longer answer===
	Yes, it is true Joseph Smith married a 14 year-old. This was not uncommon for girls as young as fourteen to marry during this period, particularly if they lived on the American frontier, where Joseph Smith resided at this time. One historian explained that the American frontier produced conditions that encouraged “early and continuous marriage of pioneer women” and “girls married young and were in a constant state of matrimony.” [James E. Davis, Frontier America, 1800-1840: A Comparative Demographic Analysis of the Settlement Process (Glendale, California: ~~Arhur~~ H. Clark, 1977), 52.] In fact, “teenage marriage was over four times more common in Joseph Smith’s America than it is today.” [Craig L. Foster, David Keller, and Gregory L. Smith, “The Age of Joseph Smith’s Plural Wives in Social and Demographic Context,” in Newell G. Bringhurst and Craig L. Foster, eds, The Persistence of Polygamy: Joseph Smith and the Origins of Mormon Polygamy (Independence, Missouri: John Whitmer Books, 2010), 160.]		Yes, it is true Joseph Smith married a 14 year-old. This was not uncommon for girls as young as fourteen to marry during this period, particularly if they lived on the American frontier, where Joseph Smith resided at this time. One historian explained that the American frontier produced conditions that encouraged “early and continuous marriage of pioneer women” and “girls married young and were in a constant state of matrimony.” [James E. Davis, Frontier America, 1800-1840: A Comparative Demographic Analysis of the Settlement Process (Glendale, California: Arthur H. Clark, 1977), 52.] In fact, “teenage marriage was over four times more common in Joseph Smith’s America than it is today.” [Craig L. Foster, David Keller, and Gregory L. Smith, “The Age of Joseph Smith’s Plural Wives in Social and Demographic Context,” in Newell G. Bringhurst and Craig L. Foster, eds, The Persistence of Polygamy: Joseph Smith and the Origins of Mormon Polygamy (Independence, Missouri: John Whitmer Books, 2010), 160.]

	Thus marrying teenage girls on the American frontier was more common than modern people realize. For example, one non-Mormon pioneer woman was asked to marry while she was still fourteen. She later recalled, “I was nearly fifteen years old and I thought it was high time that I got married so I consented.” Another person later remembered that in 1840s Oregon “the young men began wondering why a girl wasn’t married if she was still single when she was 16.” Limited available statistics from non-Mormon counties near Nauvoo also had a significant number of marriages to teenage brides. In Louisa County, Iowa, for example, between 1842 and 1852, fifty-one percent of marriages were to brides aged nineteen and younger. Seventeen percent of the females married when they were sixteen and younger. Thus Joseph Smith’s marriage to a fourteen year old bride was not out of step with his time-period. On the American frontier in the 1840s, men often married women much younger than themselves, and women tended to marry younger.		Thus marrying teenage girls on the American frontier was more common than modern people realize. For example, one non-Mormon pioneer woman was asked to marry while she was still fourteen. She later recalled, “I was nearly fifteen years old and I thought it was high time that I got married so I consented.” Another person later remembered that in 1840s Oregon “the young men began wondering why a girl wasn’t married if she was still single when she was 16.” Limited available statistics from non-Mormon counties near Nauvoo also had a significant number of marriages to teenage brides. In Louisa County, Iowa, for example, between 1842 and 1852, fifty-one percent of marriages were to brides aged nineteen and younger. Seventeen percent of the females married when they were sixteen and younger. Thus Joseph Smith’s marriage to a fourteen year old bride was not out of step with his time-period. On the American frontier in the 1840s, men often married women much younger than themselves, and women tended to marry younger.

GeorgeCobabe: /* Longer answer */

2010-10-06T23:37:27Z

Longer answer

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:37, 6 October 2010
Line 126:		Line 126:
	6 And whatsoever thing is good is just and true; wherefore, nothing that is good denieth the Christ, but acknowledgeth that he is.		6 And whatsoever thing is good is just and true; wherefore, nothing that is good denieth the Christ, but acknowledgeth that he is.
	7 And ye may know that he is, by the power of the Holy Ghost; wherefore I would exhort you that ye deny not the power of God; for he worketh by power, according to the faith of the children of men, the same today and tomorrow, and forever.		7 And ye may know that he is, by the power of the Holy Ghost; wherefore I would exhort you that ye deny not the power of God; for he worketh by power, according to the faith of the children of men, the same today and tomorrow, and forever.
	It says we must read the Book of Mormon, ponder the mercy of the Lord in giving scripture to men, and pray to the Father in the name of Christ asking if these things are not true; with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ.		[[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] Delete the following as it is repetitive: It says we must read the Book of Mormon, ponder the mercy of the Lord in giving scripture to men, and pray to the Father in the name of Christ asking if these things are not true; with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ. [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]]

	===Additional resources===		===Additional resources===

GeorgeCobabe: /* Longer answer */

2010-10-06T23:36:06Z

Longer answer

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 6 October 2010
Line 97:		Line 97:

	*[[User:JamesStutz\|JamesStutz]](Alternative: I'd turn these into bullet points that an inexperienced young missionary can simply copy and paste)		*[[User:JamesStutz\|JamesStutz]](Alternative: I'd turn these into bullet points that an inexperienced young missionary can simply copy and paste)
			[[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] too much information about subjects that were not asked about. I would keep it far more general. [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]]

	The so called "anachronisms" in the Book of Mormon have all been accounted for through plausible explanations. These explanations all tend to fall into a few categories:		The so called "anachronisms" in the Book of Mormon have all been accounted for through plausible explanations. These explanations all tend to fall into a few categories:
	* The Book of Mormon is a translation of an ancient document. Sometimes in the translation an English word is used whose origin is far removed from Ancient America or ancient Hebrew or Egyptian. Some examples include "Christ", "church" and "adieu". Those words obviously would not have been used by the ancient authors of the Book of Mormon, but they are part of modern English and so Joseph Smith used those words to translate the equivalent Nephite word on the gold plates. The same practice is found in the Bible (ex. the word "book" in the Old Testament)		* The Book of Mormon is a translation of an ancient document. Sometimes in the translation an English word is used whose origin is far removed from Ancient America or ancient Hebrew or Egyptian. Some examples include "Christ", "church" and "adieu". Those words obviously would not have been used by the ancient authors of the Book of Mormon, but they are part of modern English and so Joseph Smith used those words to translate the equivalent Nephite word on the gold plates. The same practice is found in the Bible (ex. the word "book" in the Old Testament)

GeorgeCobabe: /* Longer answer */

2010-10-06T23:33:43Z

Longer answer

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:33, 6 October 2010
Line 57:		Line 57:

	*[[User:JamesStutz\|JamesStutz]] (Alternative: I'd simplify the answer, removing all the quotes and breaking it down into easy points that a young missionary can regurgitate):		*[[User:JamesStutz\|JamesStutz]] (Alternative: I'd simplify the answer, removing all the quotes and breaking it down into easy points that a young missionary can regurgitate):
	(1) Mormons don't view scripture in exactly the same way as some other Christians. Because scripture is not "inerrant" (flawless), it is ok to make changes from time to time to improve the text. It helps us get closer to God's intended message. It is entirely possible that further changes could be made to the Book of Mormon, which we would welcome if done by inspiration.		(1) Mormons don't view scripture in exactly the same way as some other Christians. Because scripture is not "inerrant" (flawless), it is ok to make changes from time to time to improve the text. It helps us get closer to God's intended message. It is entirely possible that further changes could be made to the Book of Mormon, which we would welcome [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] when [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] done by inspiration.

	(2) The vast majority of all changes made to the Book of Mormon are changes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Only a small handful of changes have been made to the text that actually change the meaning of the text in any way. Many of these changes were made by Joseph Smith himself.		(2) The vast majority of all changes made to the Book of Mormon are changes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Only a small handful of changes have been made to the text that actually change the meaning of the text in any way. Many of these changes were made by Joseph Smith himself.

	(3) Anyone is welcome to read earlier editions of the Book of Mormon and compare it with modern editions. The LDS Church is not trying to be deceitful or secretive about these changes.		(3) Anyone is welcome to read earlier editions of the Book of Mormon and compare it with modern editions. [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] delete this statement and rephrase it in a postive statement: The LDS Church is not trying to be deceitful or secretive about these changes.[[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]]The Church is currently involved in a long project to make available all the documents regarding the various editions of the Book of Mormon.[[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] Comment not for the text: something should be noted about Skousens work. [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]]

	(4) Joseph Smith said that the Book of Mormon was the "most correct book" in the sense that "a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts than by any other book." In other words, the Book of Mormon is not the most correct book in terms of spelling, punctuation, and grammar, but in terms of its ability to bring a man closer to Christ.		(4) Joseph Smith said that the Book of Mormon was the "most correct book" in the sense that "a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts than by any other book." In other words, the Book of Mormon is not the most correct book in terms of spelling, punctuation, and grammar, but in terms of its ability to bring a man closer to Christ.

GeorgeCobabe: /* Longer answer */

2010-10-06T23:29:27Z

Longer answer

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 6 October 2010
Line 48:		Line 48:
	Book of Mormon authors themselves admitted their own susceptibility to err (1 Nephi 19:6; 2 Nephi 33:11; 3 Nephi 23:12-13; Mormon 8:12, 16-17; 9:31; Ether 12:23-25) and even the Book of Mormon title page admits, "if there are faults they are the mistakes of men; wherefore condemn not the things of God....”		Book of Mormon authors themselves admitted their own susceptibility to err (1 Nephi 19:6; 2 Nephi 33:11; 3 Nephi 23:12-13; Mormon 8:12, 16-17; 9:31; Ether 12:23-25) and even the Book of Mormon title page admits, "if there are faults they are the mistakes of men; wherefore condemn not the things of God....”

	Robert J. Matthews notes that during the Prophet Joseph Smith's lifetime, "three editions of the Book of Mormon were printed. Each time he amended the text in a few places to more correctly convey the intended meaning of his translation. Other changes in these and successive editions were made to correct typographical errors, improper spelling, and inaccurate or missing punctuation and to improve grammar and sentence structure or eliminate ambiguity. None of these changes, individually or collectively, alters the message of the Book of Mormon" (A Sure Foundation, p. 34).		Robert J. Matthews [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] who is he? [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]]notes that during the Prophet Joseph Smith's lifetime, "three editions of the Book of Mormon were printed. Each time he amended the text in a few places to more correctly convey the intended meaning of his translation. Other changes in these and successive editions were made to correct typographical errors, improper spelling, and inaccurate or missing punctuation and to improve grammar and sentence structure or eliminate ambiguity. None of these changes, individually or collectively, alters the message of the Book of Mormon" (A Sure Foundation, p. 34).

	Sidney B. Sperry affirmed that, "The sense of the first edition has not been disturbed in later editions, and the thousands of changes are relatively minor in nature, in matters of punctuation, spelling, diction, correction of errors and the like. The thing that counts still remains, the message and sense of the original translation" (Problems of the Book of Mormon, p. 209, as quoted in Stan Larson's Changes in Early Texts of the Book of Mormon, F.A.R.M.S. Reprint).		Sidney B. Sperry [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] who is he? [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] affirmed that, "The sense of the first edition has not been disturbed in later editions, and the thousands of changes are relatively minor in nature, in matters of punctuation, spelling, diction, correction of errors and the like. The thing that counts still remains, the message and sense of the original translation" (Problems of the Book of Mormon, p. 209, as quoted in Stan Larson's Changes in Early Texts of the Book of Mormon, F.A.R.M.S. Reprint).

	Gilbert W. Scharffs observed that, "Ninety-nine percent of the original edition of the Book of Mormon has not been changed. Indeed, 4000 changes seems amazingly few.... Dozens of articles and books have been written on the subject of Book of Mormon changes and these changes have logical explanations and almost every change is trivial. It seems inconsistent for the authors to criticize the Book of Mormon that has but a small fraction of the number of changes that have been made in the Bible" (The Truth about The God Makers, p. 160; see also Scrapbook of Mormon Polemics, num. 1, pp. 2-3, Mormon Miscellaneous).		Gilbert W. Scharffs [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]] who? [[User:GeorgeCobabe\|GeorgeCobabe]]observed that, "Ninety-nine percent of the original edition of the Book of Mormon has not been changed. Indeed, 4000 changes seems amazingly few.... Dozens of articles and books have been written on the subject of Book of Mormon changes and these changes have logical explanations and almost every change is trivial. It seems inconsistent for the authors to criticize the Book of Mormon that has but a small fraction of the number of changes that have been made in the Bible" (The Truth about The God Makers, p. 160; see also Scrapbook of Mormon Polemics, num. 1, pp. 2-3, Mormon Miscellaneous).

	When one considers the fact that the Book of Mormon "manuscript was one solid paragraph, without punctuation mark, from beginning to end" (Nibley, Since Cumorah, p. 4) and that the printer was given free hand with punctuation and spelling, it should not surprise us that corrections were necessary in later editions. In fact, of the nearly 4000 changes noted by our critics, approximately 2000 were grammatical errors (Joseph Fielding McConkie, Seeking the Spirit, p. 38). Lack of standardization of spelling and grammar in those days and the use of multiple scribes in the translation process surely made later changes necessary to improve readability but when these are discounted we still have a small number of textual changes which remain.		When one considers the fact that the Book of Mormon "manuscript was one solid paragraph, without punctuation mark, from beginning to end" (Nibley, Since Cumorah, p. 4) and that the printer was given free hand with punctuation and spelling, it should not surprise us that corrections were necessary in later editions. In fact, of the nearly 4000 changes noted by our critics, approximately 2000 were grammatical errors (Joseph Fielding McConkie, Seeking the Spirit, p. 38). Lack of standardization of spelling and grammar in those days and the use of multiple scribes in the translation process surely made later changes necessary to improve readability but when these are discounted we still have a small number of textual changes which remain.

JamesStutz: /* QUESTION 7c: Book of Mormon unusual references (claimed "anachronisms") */

2010-10-06T02:00:32Z

QUESTION 7c: Book of Mormon unusual references (claimed "anachronisms")

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 6 October 2010
Line 81:		Line 81:

	===Short answer===		===Short answer===
	The Book of Mormon ~~was~~ a translation of an ancient work. Joseph Smith, though translating by the gift and power of God, rendered a translation in his own language using 19th century ~~word~~ that were as close as possible to the intent of the original authors. Words like "adieu" were in common use in Joseph Smith's day. Terms like "horse" were possibly the best translation for an animal that served the same or similar purpose for the people of the Book of Mormon.		The Book of Mormon is a translation of an ancient work. Joseph Smith, though translating by the gift and power of God, rendered a translation in his own language using 19th century words that were as close as possible to the intent of the original authors. Words like "adieu" were in common use in Joseph Smith's day. Terms like "horse" were possibly the best translation for an animal that served the same or similar purpose for the people of the Book of Mormon.

			*[[User:JamesStutz\|JamesStutz]](Alternative: I wouldn't introduce anachronisms that the questioner is not already aware of in our response):
			Sometimes certain words or ideas appear in the Book of Mormon that might seem out of place at first glance. Over the past 100+ years LDS scholars have found logical explanations for each of these perceived "anachronisms".

	{{Common Questions Navigation Tool}}		{{Common Questions Navigation Tool}}
Line 92:		Line 95:

	One should not reject the possibility of "loan-shifting," in which a name for a familiar species is applied for a new species. This is a well-known phenomenon — for example, Amerindians called European horses 'deer' when they first encountered them. The classic example is, of course, the hippopotamus, which name the Greeks gave to an animal they called a "river (potamus) horse (hippo)." Critics who scoff should ask themselves how anyone could mistake a hippopotamus for a horse — the answer, of course, is that the Greeks knew perfectly well that the hippo was not a true horse, but the name stuck.		One should not reject the possibility of "loan-shifting," in which a name for a familiar species is applied for a new species. This is a well-known phenomenon — for example, Amerindians called European horses 'deer' when they first encountered them. The classic example is, of course, the hippopotamus, which name the Greeks gave to an animal they called a "river (potamus) horse (hippo)." Critics who scoff should ask themselves how anyone could mistake a hippopotamus for a horse — the answer, of course, is that the Greeks knew perfectly well that the hippo was not a true horse, but the name stuck.

			*[[User:JamesStutz\|JamesStutz]](Alternative: I'd turn these into bullet points that an inexperienced young missionary can simply copy and paste)
			The so called "anachronisms" in the Book of Mormon have all been accounted for through plausible explanations. These explanations all tend to fall into a few categories:
			* The Book of Mormon is a translation of an ancient document. Sometimes in the translation an English word is used whose origin is far removed from Ancient America or ancient Hebrew or Egyptian. Some examples include "Christ", "church" and "adieu". Those words obviously would not have been used by the ancient authors of the Book of Mormon, but they are part of modern English and so Joseph Smith used those words to translate the equivalent Nephite word on the gold plates. The same practice is found in the Bible (ex. the word "book" in the Old Testament)
			* Many perceived anachronisms are not anachronisms at all. Over the years scholars, LDS and non-LDS alike, have discovered many items in the Americas that at one point were considered anachronistic. Those items are no longer anachronistic. Examples include complex civilizations, cement, various animals and plants, and swords.
			* Some of the "anachronisms" can be accounted for through "loan-shifting". Loan-shifting is when an object is given the name of something similar to it because the real name is unknown or does not exist in a particular language. For example, the ancient Greeks did not have a name for the large mammal they found swimming in the Nile river, so they used a name for something it reminded them of, the "horse", and so they named it "river-horse", which in Greek is "hippopotamus". This very common phenomena might account for some of the perceived anachronisms in the Book of Mormon.

	===Additional resources===		===Additional resources===
Line 98:		Line 107:
	* http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Anachronisms/Animals#Horse - for horses		* http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Anachronisms/Animals#Horse - for horses
	* http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Anachronisms - general list of all claimed anachronisms		* http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Anachronisms - general list of all claimed anachronisms
			* http://www.fairlds.org/Book_of_Mormon/AshHorse/
			* http://lehislibrary.wordpress.com/2009/04/19/eskimo-loanshifting-horses-as-big-dogs/

	==QUESTION 7d: How can one know if the Book of Mormon is true?==		==QUESTION 7d: How can one know if the Book of Mormon is true?==

JamesStutz: /* Additional resources */

2010-10-06T01:27:09Z

Additional resources

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:27, 6 October 2010
Line 69:		Line 69:
	===Additional resources===		===Additional resources===
	*[[Book of Mormon/Textual changes\|Textual changes]]		*[[Book of Mormon/Textual changes\|Textual changes]]

	http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon_textual_changes		http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon_textual_changes

	http://www.jefflindsay.com/LDSFAQ/FQ_changes.shtml		http://www.jefflindsay.com/LDSFAQ/FQ_changes.shtml

	http://www.mormonfortress.com/changeb3.html		http://www.mormonfortress.com/changeb3.html

	http://www.fairlds.org/FAIR_Conferences/2002_Changes_in_the_Book_of_Mormon.html		http://www.fairlds.org/FAIR_Conferences/2002_Changes_in_the_Book_of_Mormon.html

JamesStutz: /* Additional resources */

2010-10-06T01:26:35Z

Additional resources

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:26, 6 October 2010
Line 69:		Line 69:
	===Additional resources===		===Additional resources===
	*[[Book of Mormon/Textual changes\|Textual changes]]		*[[Book of Mormon/Textual changes\|Textual changes]]
			http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon_textual_changes
			http://www.jefflindsay.com/LDSFAQ/FQ_changes.shtml
			http://www.mormonfortress.com/changeb3.html
			http://www.fairlds.org/FAIR_Conferences/2002_Changes_in_the_Book_of_Mormon.html

	==QUESTION 7c: Book of Mormon unusual references (claimed "anachronisms")==		==QUESTION 7c: Book of Mormon unusual references (claimed "anachronisms")==

JamesStutz: /* Longer answer */

2010-10-06T01:26:05Z

Longer answer

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:26, 6 October 2010
Line 55:		Line 55:

	When one considers the fact that the Book of Mormon "manuscript was one solid paragraph, without punctuation mark, from beginning to end" (Nibley, Since Cumorah, p. 4) and that the printer was given free hand with punctuation and spelling, it should not surprise us that corrections were necessary in later editions. In fact, of the nearly 4000 changes noted by our critics, approximately 2000 were grammatical errors (Joseph Fielding McConkie, Seeking the Spirit, p. 38). Lack of standardization of spelling and grammar in those days and the use of multiple scribes in the translation process surely made later changes necessary to improve readability but when these are discounted we still have a small number of textual changes which remain.		When one considers the fact that the Book of Mormon "manuscript was one solid paragraph, without punctuation mark, from beginning to end" (Nibley, Since Cumorah, p. 4) and that the printer was given free hand with punctuation and spelling, it should not surprise us that corrections were necessary in later editions. In fact, of the nearly 4000 changes noted by our critics, approximately 2000 were grammatical errors (Joseph Fielding McConkie, Seeking the Spirit, p. 38). Lack of standardization of spelling and grammar in those days and the use of multiple scribes in the translation process surely made later changes necessary to improve readability but when these are discounted we still have a small number of textual changes which remain.

			*[[User:JamesStutz\|JamesStutz]] (Alternative: I'd simplify the answer, removing all the quotes and breaking it down into easy points that a young missionary can regurgitate):
			(1) Mormons don't view scripture in exactly the same way as some other Christians. Because scripture is not "inerrant" (flawless), it is ok to make changes from time to time to improve the text. It helps us get closer to God's intended message. It is entirely possible that further changes could be made to the Book of Mormon, which we would welcome if done by inspiration.

			(2) The vast majority of all changes made to the Book of Mormon are changes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Only a small handful of changes have been made to the text that actually change the meaning of the text in any way. Many of these changes were made by Joseph Smith himself.

			(3) Anyone is welcome to read earlier editions of the Book of Mormon and compare it with modern editions. The LDS Church is not trying to be deceitful or secretive about these changes.

			(4) Joseph Smith said that the Book of Mormon was the "most correct book" in the sense that "a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts than by any other book." In other words, the Book of Mormon is not the most correct book in terms of spelling, punctuation, and grammar, but in terms of its ability to bring a man closer to Christ.

			(5) Modern translations of the Bible differ in thousands of ways from earlier translations of the Bible (ex. KJV vs NIV). The changes are an attempt to improve translation and help the reader better understand God's intended message. That is precisely the motivation behind changes in the Book of Mormon.

	===Additional resources===		===Additional resources===

JamesStutz: /* Short answer */

2010-10-06T01:23:54Z

Short answer

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:23, 6 October 2010
Line 39:		Line 39:
	===Short answer===		===Short answer===
	Mormons do not believe the Book of Mormon to be perfect or infallible because men, some of them uninspired, took part in the recording, copying, and publishing of the first and successive editions of the Book of Mormon. Hugh Nibley has observed that "once the possibility of human error is conceded, why should the idea of a corrected Book of Mormon be offensive? Revised and improved editions of the Bible are constantly coming from the press, and the Mormons have never believed in an infallible book or an infallible anything in which men have had a hand. God allows fallible humans to be co-workers with him on the road to a far-distant perfection, but he expects them to make lots of mistakes along the way" (Since Cumorah, p. 4).		Mormons do not believe the Book of Mormon to be perfect or infallible because men, some of them uninspired, took part in the recording, copying, and publishing of the first and successive editions of the Book of Mormon. Hugh Nibley has observed that "once the possibility of human error is conceded, why should the idea of a corrected Book of Mormon be offensive? Revised and improved editions of the Bible are constantly coming from the press, and the Mormons have never believed in an infallible book or an infallible anything in which men have had a hand. God allows fallible humans to be co-workers with him on the road to a far-distant perfection, but he expects them to make lots of mistakes along the way" (Since Cumorah, p. 4).

			*[[User:JamesStutz\|JamesStutz]] (Alternative):
			There have been many changes made to the text of the Book of Mormon since it was first translated by Joseph Smith. The vast majority of those changes are changes in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Latter-day Saints aren't bothered by it because we don't believe that any scripture is "inerrant". If and when a change to the text is necessary we welcome it as an opportunity to get closer to God's intended message.

	===Longer answer===		===Longer answer===