https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AMormonism_and_the_nature_of_God%2F%22Celestial_sex%22 2026-04-06T02:16:50Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.41.0 https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?title=Talk:Mormonism_and_the_nature_of_God/%22Celestial_sex%22&diff=96233&oldid=prev 2012-05-16T20:30:36Z

<p>sex is not icky</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>&#039;&#039;&#039;Nathan000000:&#039;&#039;&#039; I&#039;m wondering if we should add somewhere in this article the point that sex is not icky. That is, even &#039;&#039;if&#039;&#039; Mormons believed that holy, divine beings participated in sexual intimacy, why would that be bad? Jesus Christ ate fish as a resurrected being; eating is not icky. If sex is sacred and lovely and pure and wonderful between two married mortals, why is it &#039;&#039;necessarily&#039;&#039; bad between two divine spouses?<br /> <br /> Of course there&#039;s no need to press the point. But might it be worth pointing out that the burden of proof is on critics to demonstrate that sexual intimacy is incompatible with a holy being?</div>

Nathan000000